|
When is a Linn not a Linn........
|
|
2010-10-29, 15:12
(This post was last modified: 2010-10-29 16:23 by John G.)
Post: #31
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've gone all Linn with my LP12 regarding arm, cartridge and power supply. I think there's a synergy there and the combination is so easy to work with and maintain.
Hearing direct comparisons in my neck of the woods with alternative arms, power supplies, cartridges in a competent dem is next to impossible. Naim kind of lost me when they used to go on about the basik power supply being better than the Valhalla or Lingo. ![]() A Linn stops being a Linn when enthusiasm for purchasing music and using it on a regular basis wanes, not the case with me. LP12, Exposure amps, Tannoy Speakers, Mana Supports |
|||
|
2010-10-29, 16:37
Post: #32
|
|||
|
|||
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
(2010-10-29 15:12)Cymbiosis Wrote:(2010-10-29 14:19)flatpopely Wrote: It still shows as a current product on their website though? The Aromatic is neither marked as discontinued but to my knowledge it has been for several years, or......? -LP12/Keel/Radikal/Ekos SE/sKale/Benz LP -LP12/Keel/Armageddon/Ekos 2/Benz Ruby 2 -Audio Research SP-11/Mark Levinson No. 27.5 -ProAc Response 3.8 |
|||
|
2010-10-29, 20:18
(This post was last modified: 2010-10-29 20:19 by sonddek.)
Post: #33
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
Interesting thread. For me, tunedem is where the Sondek lags some of the competition. Where it competes well is timbre. But timbre ain't tune. Maybe Sondek is engineered using timbredem.
Well Tempered Amadeus GT - Garrard 301 - Technics SL1210 - Technics SL-10 - Sondek/Cirkus/Lingo - Ekos II - SME 3009 II - AT OC9 II - Ortofon 2M Bronze - Uphorik - Dynavector P75 - Creek OBH-22 - Aktiv5125(D) - Akurate 242 II |
|||
|
2010-10-30, 10:18
Post: #34
|
|||
|
|||
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
(2010-10-29 09:03)Andy Wrote: * then we have the duchess, saying "any time you use a non-Linn item, it no longer (is) the sound Linn intended". One might think she is an out-and-out Linnie ...andy, I stopped being a *Linnie* when I have heard the ARO. Quote: and yet she appears to runs an Aro, a Miyabe and a non-Linn plinth (a Chris H plinth?)! ...and now with a non-Linn power supply... ![]() So, my deck has an LP12 logo on it, but it does not quite sound like one for sure. MyBriks.com |
|||
|
2010-10-30, 10:33
Post: #35
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........ | |||
|
2010-10-30, 14:20
Post: #36
|
|||
|
|||
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
(2010-10-29 13:28)AdamWysokinski Wrote: Regarding the topic - I agree with kuma that any non-Linn component makes a non-Linn turntable. When you look at other turntables, you would call them by their name despite the fact they probably don't make cartridges or arms & you wouldn't dispute the fact it was a Michell Gyro or a EAR Mechanic for example. You can include the Majik LP12 in this as it uses a non LINN arm. So I'd say a Sondek is always a Sondek as long as it still produces a sound that complements the deck rather than radically change it. I do remember way back probably in the late 80's when a company produced a bearing housing & spindle for the Sondek & it sounded really quite different. Although at the time (I'd just purchased my 'first' Sondek) interest in modifying the way equipment sounds back then was small. Don't know what happened to the company or whom they were, the company or the product seems to have vanished without a trace. |
|||
|
2010-10-30, 14:35
Post: #37
|
|||
|
|||
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
(2010-10-30 14:20)eye-fi Wrote: When you look at other turntables, you would call them by their name despite the fact they probably don't make cartridges or arms & you wouldn't dispute the fact it was a Michell Gyro or a EAR Mechanic for example. You can include the Majik LP12 in this as it uses a non LINN arm. Well, Michel has its own tonearm (modified Rega AFAIK). Regarding the Majik - I'm not sure whether the Majik tonearm is somewhat modified according to Linn spec. I believe in synergy when building audio systems. Using Linn-only components of similar level of advancement (that's why I wouldn't mix eg. Radikal with Akito or Ekos SE with Adikt) I rest assured the highest level of synergy "within" a turntable is maintained. Sonneteer Byron ➔ Sonneteer Orton ➔ Harbeth SHL5 |
|||
|
2010-10-30, 14:42
Post: #38
|
|||
|
|||
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
(2010-10-30 14:35)AdamWysokinski Wrote: Well, Michel has its own tonearm (modified Rega AFAIK). Regarding the Majik - I'm not sure whether the Majik tonearm is somewhat modified according to Linn spec. I knew if I quoted a manufacturer someone would say they have a tonearm lol. However I don't think even Michel would consider the Rega a top flight arm that does the deck true justice hence the use of SME. |
|||
|
2010-10-30, 15:11
(This post was last modified: 2010-10-30 15:12 by Julian H.)
Post: #39
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
I have heard that Michell consider the Technoarm A comparable to the SME4. If that is true the Technoarm A is a bargain.
Strathklyde Sondek [by Cymbiosis] ![]() Sennheiser HD800 cans Everythin' else is from Salisbury baby
|
|||
|
2010-10-30, 17:53
Post: #40
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: When is a Linn not a Linn........
The Technoarm is not on par with an SME IV, I owned one for a short time.
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help






![[Image: napsa_logo.jpg]](http://www.kumadesign.com/PIX/LP12/REBUILD2010/napsa_logo.jpg)

